Romesser et al. reported on a retrospective study among 776 patients treated from 1990 to 2010 with dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy. The median radiation dose was 81Gy. None received adjuvant ADT. They defined a bounce as a PSA rise ≥ 0.2 ng/ml but less than 2.0 ng/ml above the lowest level (nadir) it had reached thus far, followed by a decrease to as low or lower than the previous nadir. After a median follow-up of 9.2 years, they found:
- 16% of patients had a bounce
- The bounce occurred after a median of 24.6 months
- It was a median of 0.37 ng/ml over the previous nadir
Bounces were more likely to occur in patients who:
- were younger (see this link)
- had a lower Gleason score
- were lower T stage
- received a higher radiation dose
At 8-years follow-up, they reported that bounces were associated with:
- Greater time to reach ultimate PSA nadir (43 months vs 26 months)
- Lower risk of PSA relapse (9% vs 29%)
- Decreased risk of metastases (1% vs 10%)
- Decreased prostate-specific mortality (0% vs 3%)
- Decreased overall mortality (6% vs 11%)
Very similar findings have been reported for other forms of radiation: SBRT, Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy (seeds), High Dose Rate Brachytherapy, and Brachy Boost Therapy. A 2004 study of EBRT and bounces found an inverse correlation between bounces and PSA relapse-free survival. The difference is probably attributable to much lower radiation dose (only 1% received > 78 Gy) and because the higher risk men were treated between 1986 to 1995, mostly before PSA testing became prevalent.
The percent of men who experience a bounce ranges from 15%-50%, and depends on how the researchers define a bounce. It ranges from a minimum of 0.1- 0.8 ng/ml above previous nadir in most studies. Bounces are often above +1 ng/ml, may last for more than a year, and are usually noted between 1 year and 4 years after therapy.
The reason that bounces occur is a bit of a mystery. There are various theories:
- Prostatitis - either pre-existing, arising after invasive procedures (e.g., biopsy, fiducial placement, or brachytherapy), or induced by radiation.
- Immune infiltration: after radiation releases cancer antigens, T cells are activated to eventually attack the remaining cancer in the prostate (see this link).
- Cancer cells that have been dormant, eventually emerge and undergo "mitotic catastrophe."
- Delayed apoptosis (cell death) among late-responding healthy cells
- PSA drops most sharply and consistently in more aggressive cancers because radiation kills the most rapidly dividing cells first.
- PSA measurement variation (e.g., different test kits, different labs, natural fluctuations)
Whatever the reason, bounces are a good thing. For patients that were diagnosed with low or intermediate risk prostate cancer, a slow, bouncy PSA decline should engender a feeling of relief rather than anxiety. But what of the unfavorable risk patient with bounces so high that they approach or exceed +2.0 ng/ml and stay elevated? While recurrences usually occur later than bounces, is there a method available for early detection of a local recurrence? Biopsies are invasive and non-informative while the cancer is still in the "slow death" phase. However, there is a kind of MRI called MR Spectroscopy (MRS) that may be able to non-invasively distinguish between bounces and PSA recurrence. In a pilot study (and this one), the researchers found that the MRS-detected choline/citrate ratio might be markedly elevated and focal if the cancer is metabolically active, but low and diffuse if there is only benign inflammatory activity.
after SBRT my original PSA (3.5) dropped to 1.9. 3months later to .89. 3months later it rose
ReplyDeleteto 1.28 and 3 months later it rose to 1.54. All this in 11 months. I just saw the RO who performed the SBRT. She is confused. Told me to wait 3 month more for the next PSA. If that rises she says the radiation treatment is considered a failure and hormone therepy is the next step. Original gleason, 3-3,3-3 3-4,3-4, 3-4. no core over 30% involved.What happened?
Both you and your RO are jumping the gun. It took me 4 years to reach my nadir. BIOCHEMICAL recurrence after radiation is defined as nadir+2, which would be 2.9 ng/ml for you - you are not even close. Even if you were, a biochemical recurrence is not the same as a clinical recurrence.
Delete